Interviews With The Founders

The way America is now - and the way America is supposed to be.
 
 

“[This book] is well written and creative and follows the pattern of a moderator interviewing the founding fathers of America.”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

What would the Founding Fathers Say About America Today?

 
Richard-Tatem-Interview-With-The-Founders-Book-Cover.png

Today is the day that you finally answer that nagging question:

Things don't seem to be going so well in America — what was the original intent for American politics, economics, religion, and patriotism?

 

Via the format of a modern, journalistic interview, the Founding Fathers' exact words on these subjects spring back to life.

Our Founding Fathers remind Americans, warn Americans, and admonish Americans, about the dangers of straying too far away from the Founders' original game plan on the quest for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

“Many informative links are provided throughout. I highly recommend all Americans and aspiring Americans read this book.”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

“This book uses the words of the US Founding Fathers to peek into how they would view, or tackle, today's major issues facing the US”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

“A great, fast read dealing with current issues and bringing us back to our foundational roots.

— Five Star Amazon Review.

 
 

Justin American talks about his new book "Interviews With the Founders - the way America is now and the way America is supposed to be."

 

“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”

— Thomas Jefferson, Founding Father of The United States.

Purchase Your Copy Today

 

Get A Signed Copy of the Book
from Etsy

 

Purchase Paperback or Kindle
on Amazon

“[The book is an] easy and informative read which spotlights the intentions of the founders and how far America has strayed.”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

“Contains the classic speeches from several historically significant Presidents which I enjoy having in one place.”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

“This book is full of historic information as well as how it can be interpreted in modern times.”

— Five Star Amazon Review.

An Excerpt of “Interviews With the Founders.”


 

Chapter 3 - Uncle Sam — How Big Should He Be?

If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself.” — The Federalist Number 51

Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast view beyond the comprehension of the weak; and that it is doing God’s service when it is violating His laws.” — John Adams

A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.” — Gerald Ford, The 38th United States President

 

Moderator: Gentlemen, let us turn our lively discussions to your views on the role, size, and nature of the government created by the American Constitution. For comparison purposes, let me start by pointing out that the staff of the first Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, had only 7 members: the Secretary of State, a Chief Clerk, three other clerks, a translator, and a messenger, with a total annual budget of $56,600. Today, the Department of State employs nearly 50,000 employees, with an annual budget of over $57 billion in 2012.

President Jefferson, as you were the first Secretary of State, what say you on the subject of the size and role of government?

Thomas Jefferson: I stated in my first inaugural address that a vital premise of government is “economy in the public expense.” In my second inaugural address, I directly addressed the issue of public debt, stating that it is “encroaching on the rights of future generations, by burdening them with the debts of the past.”

Also, in my first inaugural address, after many years in public service and after having spent many years overseas as a diplomat for the American cause, I told my fellow citizens that “a wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government; and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities [happiness].”

 

Moderator: Yes, yes, “frugal” - meaning the avoidance of unnecessary spending of money – the American government is currently in 2014 borrowing about one of every three dollars it spends, accumulating massive amounts of public debt now surpassing 17 trillion dollars, exceeding the current $16 trillion a year American gross domestic economic product, and this sum does not include tens of trillions of dollars in additional debt owed in government entitlement programs.

Do you have any further comments President Jefferson?

President Thomas Jefferson: I once told James Madison “no generation may contract debts greater than may be paid during its own existence... with respect to future debts, would it not be wise & just for that nation to declare, in the constitution, they are forming, that neither the legislature nor the nation itself, can validly contract more debt than they may pay within their own age”

I was a champion of cutting government waste, and I pointed out my efforts in my second inaugural address: “The suppression of unnecessary offices, of useless establishments and expenses, enabled us to discontinue our internal taxes. These, covering our land with officers and opening our doors to their intrusions, had already begun that process of domiciliary vexation which once entered is scarcely to be restrained from reaching successively every article of property and produce. If among these taxes some minor ones fell which had not been inconvenient, it was because their amount would not have paid the officers who collected them, and because, if they had any merit, the State authorities might adopt them instead of others less approved.”

“The multiplication of public offices, increase of expense beyond income, growth and entailment of a public debt, are indications soliciting the employment of the pruning knife.”

"And I sincerely believe...that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity in the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes, a principle which, if acted on, would save one half the wars of the world.”

“I, however, place economy among the first and most important republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared.”

“We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude [emphasis added].”

 

Moderator: Well, President Jefferson, am I correct in stating that you were very concerned about the growth of the federal government because such growth would cause ever-increasing public debt and would dangerously increase the power of the federal government to intrude on the domestic lives of American citizens?

President Thomas Jefferson: Please allow me to cite from a letter I wrote to Mr. Joseph Cabell that outlines my ideas on the division of state and federal powers: “Let the national government be entrusted with the defense of the nation, and its foreign and federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, laws, police, and administration of what concerns the State generally; the counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each ward direct the interests within itself. It is by dividing and subdividing these republics from the great national one down through all its subordinations until it ends in the administration of every man's farm by himself; by placing under every one what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best.”

I expressed further my concerns about an ever-growing federal government: “What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body, no matter whether of the autocrats of Russia or France or of the aristocrats of a Venetian senate.”

“Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government. Public servants at such a distance, and from under the eye of their constituents, must, from the circumstance of distance, be unable to administer and overlook all the details necessary for the good government of the citizens; and the same circumstance, by rendering detection impossible to their constituents, will invite public agents to corruption, plunder and waste."

“Were we directed from Washington when to sow, & when to reap, we should soon want bread. It is by this partition of cares, descending in gradation from general to particular, that the mass of human affairs may be best managed for the good and prosperity of all.”

.....Finally, near the end of my natural life, I restated my position on the role of the federal government in my 1825 “Draft Declaration and Protest of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on the Principles of the Constitution of the United States of America, and on the Violations of them" when I wrote that one of the greatest calamities that could befall the USA would be “submission to a government of unlimited powers.”

 

Moderator: It appears that you are against the consolidation of more and more power in the federal government?

President Thomas Jefferson: Oh yes, most definitely because “it is not by the consolidation or concentration of powers, but by their distribution, that good government is effected. Were not this great country already divided into States, that division must be made that each might do for itself what concerns itself directly and what it can so much better do than a distant authority. Every state again is divided into counties, each to take care of what lies within its local bounds; each county again into townships or wards, to manage more minute details; and every ward into farms, to be governed each by its individual proprietor."

“The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents.”

Should we “commit to the governor and council the management of all our farms, our mills and merchants' stores? No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to. One method of assault may be to effect in the forms of the Constitution alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown... Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian.”

 

Moderator: President Jefferson, thank you for your most enlightening comments.

President Washington, I seem to remember that you too were very concerned about the separation of powers between the different branches of government. In recent times, Presidents of all parties have been prone to use more and more executive power to put in place federal regulations that they cannot get passed by the Congress as laws.

What do you think of such practices?

President George Washington: “It is important...that the habits of thinking in a free country, should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism...”

“If, in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the constitution designates.—But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.—The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield [emphasis added].”

 

Moderator: But what about the “General Welfare” clause of the Constitution? Does not the preamble to the Constitution say that “We the people” empower the government to look after the “general welfare” of the nation?

President James Madison: “If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. It is to be remarked that the phrase out of which this doctrine is elaborated, is copied from the old articles of Confederation, where it was always understood as nothing more than a general caption to the specified powers, and it is a fact that it was preferred in the new instrument [Constitution] for that very reason as less liable than any other to misunderstanding [emphasis added].”

“If Congress can apply money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may establish teachers in every State, county, and parish, and pay them out of the public Treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post roads. In short, everything, from the highest object of State legislation, down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress; for every object I have mentioned would admit the application of money, and might be called, if Congress pleased, provisions for the general welfare.”

 

Moderator: So it appears that you agree with President Jefferson that care should be taken in order that the federal government not be allowed to interfere with affairs that are not part of its enumerated powers?

James Madison: Oh, most definitely yes!

“The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general.”

 

Purchase Your Copy Today!

 

Get A Signed Copy of the Book
from Etsy

 

Purchase Paperback or Kindle
on Amazon